Coordinated Meta-level Control for Tracking Meteorological Phenomenon

PI: Anita Raja

RA: Shanjun Cheng

Collaborator:  Professor Victor Lesser, UMass

Sponsor: NSF

 hurricanelightningNetRads [Zink05a, Zink05b]  is a network of adaptive radars controlled by a collection of Meteorological Command and Control (MCC) agents that instruct where to scan based on emerging weather conditions. The NetRad radar is designed to quickly detect low-lying meteorological phenomena such as tornadoes. Each MCC agent has several radar associated with it. The MCC agent gathers raw data from the radars and runs detection algorithms on weather data to recognize significant meteorological phenomenon [Kra07].   It executes a local combinatorial optimization algorithm to determine the best configuration from a local point of view, then exchanges these configurations with neighborhood agents and a hill-climbing negotiation algorithm to determine which radars to activate and how much time to allocate to each task. This process of local optimization and negotiation is time-bounded since radars need to be constantly repositioned to track weather phenomena and recognize the arrival of ones.

Meta-level control in this application will balance the resources spent on local combinatorial optimization versus the number of negotiation cycles. This is important because in certain situations it is better to do a good job in local optimization and allocate fewer cycles to negotiation while in other situations more cycles for negotiation would be better. For example, if there are a lot of boundary tasks , then having more negotiation cycles to coordinate the scanning tasks may be preferable. This work involves gathering data to develop the methodology to determine where this balance is  and developing techniques to automate the meta-level control decision making process. The main research questions in developing this methodology as discussed above are:

  • How to make meta-level control decisions about deliberations and problem solving contexts?
  • Which data to collect for performance profiles?
  • How to coordinate the meta-level decision making process among agents?
  • How to ensure that meta-level control has low-overhead?
  • How to dynamically split the network into sub-networks that are coordinated but do not necessarily have the same meta-level control?
  • How to handle multi-agent meta-level control messages?
  • How to capture and reason about the sequential nature of these research issues?

In the multi-agent (multi-MCC) context, meta-level control decisions at different agents need to be coordinated [Alex07]. These agents  have multiple high-level goals from which to choose, but if two or more radars need to coordinate their actions, the agents' meta-control components must be on the same page. That is, the agents must reason about the same problem and may need to be at the same stage of the problem-solving process (e.g., if one agent decides to devote little time to communication/negotiation before moving to other deliberative decisions while another agent sets aside a large portion of deliberation time for negotiation, the latter agent would waste time trying to negotiate with an unwilling partner). Thus if an agent changes the problem solving context it is focusing on, it must notify other agents with which it may interact. This suggests that the meta-control component of each agent should have a multi-agent policy, where the progression of what deliberations agents do, and when, is choreographed carefully and includes branches to account for what could happen as deliberation (and execution) plays out.  We are currently exploring these issues [Cheng10c].

Radar Simulator

UMASS Netrads simulator to track tornadoes

Figure 1: UMASS Netrads simulator to track tornadoes [Kra07]

Our Approach

We design and develop a multiagent meta-level control (MMLC) approach that involves coordination of decentralized Markov Decision Processes (DEC-MDPs) using the Weighted Policy Learning (WPL) algorithm [Cheng10a].

Control flow in MMLC Module of each MCC involving 4 MCCs
                                        Figure 2: Control flow in MMLC Module of each MCC involving 4 MCCs. [Cheng10b]

Experiments

We empirically show that distributed meta-level control gives a performance advantage in NetRads for a number of scenarios.

 

LRHS ScenariosMRMS Scenarios

                      Figure 3: LRHS Scenarios [Cheng10a]                                                    Figure 4: MRMS Scenarios [Cheng10a]

HRLS ScenariosNegotiation Time with 3 MCC

                        Figure 5: HRLS Scenarios [Cheng10a]                                             Figure 6: Negotiation Time with 3 MCCs[Cheng10a]

Average Quality wrt percentage of pinpointing tasks Average Quality wrt number of tasks.

      Figure 7: Average Quality wrt percentage of pinpointing tasks                                        Figure 8: Average Quality wrt number of tasks.

 

 

References:

  • [Cheng10a] Shanjun Cheng, Anita Raja and Victor Lesser, ""Multiagent Meta-level Control for a Network of Weather Radars " In Proceedings of 2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology (IAT-2010), pp 157-164, Toronto, Canada. (Acceptance Rate: 18.8%)
  • [Cheng10b] Shanjun Cheng, Anita Raja and Victor Lesser, ""Multiagent Meta-level Control for Predicting Meteorological Phenomena" In Proceedings of  AAAI-2010 Workshop on Metareasoning in Robust Social Systems, pp 6-13. Atlanta, GA.
  • [Cheng10c] Shanjun Cheng, Anita Raja and Victor Lesser, "Towards Multiagent Meta-level Control"  In  Proceedngs of AAAI-2010, Student Abstract and Poster Program,  pp. 1925-1926, Atlanta, GA.
  • [Alex07] G. Alexander, A. Raja, E. Durfee and D. Musliner, Design Paradigms for Meta-Control in Multi-Agent Systems Proceedings of AAMAS 2007 Workshop on Metareasoning in Agent-based Systems, pp 92-103, Hawaii, May 2007.
  • [Kra07] M. Krainin, B. An, V.  Lesser,  An Application of Automated Negotiation to Distributed Task Allocation.   IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology (IAT 2007). November 2007.
  • [Zink05a] M. Zink, D. Westbrook, E. Lyons, K. Hondl, J. Kurose, F. Junyent, L. Krnan and V. Chandrasekar University of Massachussetts Amherst, 2005. "NetRad: Distributed, Collaborative and Adaptive Sensing of the Atmosphere. Calibration and Initial Benchmarks", International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems, Marina Del Rey, CA, USA, June 30 - July 1, 2005.
  • [Zink05b] M. Zink, D. Westbrook, S. Abdallah, B. Horling, V. Lakamraju, E. Lyons, V. Manfredi, J. Kurose, and K. Hondl, 2005. "Meteorological Command and Control: An End-to-end Architecture for a Hazardous Weather Detection Sensor Network", Workshop on End-to-End, Sense-and-Respond Systems, Applications, and Services, Seattle, WA, USA, June 5, 2005, pp. 37-42.

Images: Courtesy of NOAA and CASA Netrads Simulator

Acknowledgement: This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. IIS: 1018067. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation (NSF).